Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Subject:
Message icon:

Attach:
Help (Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: doc, gif, jpg, jpeg, mpg, pdf, png, txt, zip, rar, csv, xls, xlsx, docx, xlsm, psd, cpp, mp4, mp3, webm, ogg, webp, py
Restrictions: 4 per post, maximum total size 1024KB, maximum individual size 512KB
Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: .
« on: June 18, 2025, 05:56:12 pm »

I had a dream about my first time here

I had gotten the fathers permission to come down here

First thing I saw was a group of **** people playing in mud in sexual poses

N.u.d.e

I was flabbergasted by their behavior why would any one enjoy getting muddied like that

I went thru the group and freeze framed everyone as I studied each one

I never did understand it then the dream ended

I've been here ever since still figuring stuff out
Interesting!

Sounds like a very nice allegory about what this realm is like.

You literally came "down here"... and you saw.

Did you really have this dream?

Indeed.
And I think I understand it now.

This would be the archetypes. The halls of Los. I think the female sculpts them. Her work in removing errors is saved and decorates along the streets as precious stones. If you focus on one very long you enter into it and experience the event. Blake describes this in the descriptive catalogue of his first art exhibition which was ruined by his own likely jealous brother. The dream I mentioned is related to male and female god archetypes:

The Lover: The lover male archetype has the most obvious connection to its feminine energy counterpart. True Divine Masculine embodiment can’t actually happen without the innate integration of feminine energy in partnership with masculine energy. Within this connection to and union with the feminine, the lover male archetype brings forth play and joy into the world. The lover allows himself sensuous pleasure for himself and others. The masculine is restored and expanded through its capacity for play, joy, love and pleasure.





Posted by: RM
« on: June 18, 2025, 04:27:40 pm »

Im not 100 percent. More like 85. Its good to hedge your bet.  ;D
Posted by: grav
« on: June 18, 2025, 03:22:48 pm »

Alex? a newbie?

The atom bomb is fake.
The Atom is fake.
Is AI fake? another hoax?
Lately, I'm leaning to an archon controller inside the Grok and robots.
______________
You asked if AI is another hoax?

The psychos who run this pond on the infinite plane have already demonstrated ad nauseum that homo ignoranus will accept a good hoax over the truth, and it may be an engineered trait. And it sure comes in handy. The bigger the lie, the more probable its acceptance. Especially when there are an inexhaustible supply of useful idiots who are willing to argue for them on forums. This is the glue which holds the lie in place. AI is just the sort of hoax, right up there with atom bombs and gravity and bendy water, that the deceivers in charge would pull out of their assss.

How about a poll?
You're what percentage hoax ? 100%
I'm 70% pro hoax.
This is old school sci-fi, going back to Star Trek and many movies that pondered the nature of intelligence.
Even Disney got into it, with Pinocchio.
Posted by: RM
« on: June 18, 2025, 02:44:55 pm »

Alex? a newbie?

The atom bomb is fake.
The Atom is fake.
Is AI fake? another hoax?
Lately, I'm leaning to an archon controller inside the Grok and robots.
______________
You asked if AI is another hoax?

The psychos who run this pond on the infinite plane have already demonstrated ad nauseum that homo ignoranus will accept a good hoax over the truth, and it may be an engineered trait. And it sure comes in handy. The bigger the lie, the more probable its acceptance. Especially when there are an inexhaustible supply of useful idiots who are willing to argue for them on forums. This is the glue which holds the lie in place. AI is just the sort of hoax, right up there with atom bombs and gravity and bendy water, that the deceivers in charge would pull out of their assss.
Posted by: GFY
« on: June 18, 2025, 10:52:34 am »

Alex? a newbie?

The atom bomb is fake.
The Atom is fake.
Is AI fake? another hoax?
Lately, I'm leaning to an archon controller inside the Grok and robots.
He has the same avatar as that Travel Assistant guy...
Posted by: grav
« on: June 18, 2025, 09:55:37 am »

Alex? a newbie?

The atom bomb is fake.
The Atom is fake.
Is AI fake? another hoax?
Lately, I'm leaning to an archon controller inside the Grok and robots.
Posted by: GFY
« on: June 18, 2025, 07:11:21 am »

What's more dangerous?

Who's to tell, OP?
Posted by: GFY
« on: June 18, 2025, 07:08:16 am »

I had a dream about my first time here

I had gotten the fathers permission to come down here

First thing I saw was a group of **** people playing in mud in sexual poses

N.u.d.e

I was flabbergasted by their behavior why would any one enjoy getting muddied like that

I went thru the group and freeze framed everyone as I studied each one

I never did understand it then the dream ended

I've been here ever since still figuring stuff out
Interesting!

Sounds like a very nice allegory about what this realm is like.

You literally came "down here"... and you saw.

Did you really have this dream?
Posted by: GFY
« on: June 18, 2025, 07:04:20 am »

They think the anomaly is  AI , Like the universe is a program , I think they stop time to fix stuff , i witnessed people freezing in time

The body is a computer but the spirit is born
Who's "they"?

Some claim so, but that's a satanic view of the universe (IMHO)?

First of all, why is the anomaly an anomaly?

Second, why should this individuality (real or not) be something artificial - something that was created by human minds?
Posted by: .
« on: June 16, 2025, 10:44:58 pm »

I had a dream about my first time here

I had gotten the fathers permission to come down here

First thing I saw was a group of **** people playing in mud in sexual poses

N.u.d.e

I was flabbergasted by their behavior why would any one enjoy getting muddied like that

I went thru the group and freeze framed everyone as I studied each one

I never did understand it then the dream ended

I've been here ever since still figuring stuff out
Posted by: Domains
« on: April 29, 2023, 07:18:44 pm »

They think the anomaly is  AI , Like the universe is a program , I think they stop time to fix stuff , i witnessed people freezing in time

The body is a computer but the spirit is born
Posted by: Alex
« on: April 29, 2023, 04:16:25 pm »

(Asia Times) The astonishing performance of recent so-called “large language models” – first and foremost OpenAI’s ChatGPT series – has raised expectations that systems able to match the cognitive capabilities of human beings, or even possess “superhuman” intelligence, may soon become a reality.

At the same time, experts in artificial intelligence are sounding dire warnings about the dangers that a further, uncontrolled development of AI would pose to society, or even to the survival of the human race itself.

Is this mere hype, of the sort that has surrounded AI for over half a century? Or is there now an urgent need for measures to control the further development of AI, even at the cost of hampering progress in this revolutionary field?

On March 22, an open letter appeared, signed by experts in artificial intelligence as well as prominent personalities like Elon Musk and closing with the statement: “Therefore we call on all AI labs to immediately pause for at least six months the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4.”



Justifying the need for such a moratorium, the open letter argues:

    Advanced AI could represent a profound change in the history of life on Earth and should be planned for and managed with commensurate care and resources. Unfortunately, this level of planning and management is not happening, even though recent months have seen AI labs locked in an out-of-control race to develop and deploy ever more powerful digital minds that no one – not even their creators – can understand, predict, or reliably control.

    [We] must ask ourselves: Should we let machines flood our information channels with propaganda and untruth? Should we automate away all the jobs, including the fulfilling ones? Should we develop nonhuman minds that might eventually outnumber, outsmart, obsolete and replace us? Should we risk loss of control of our civilization?

https://asiatimes.com/2023/04/is-ai-more-dangerous-than-the-atomic-bomb/