Post reply

Name:
Subject:
Message icon:

Attach:
📎
Drag & drop files here or click to browse
Restrictions: 4 per post, maximum total size 1024KB, maximum individual size 512KB
Allowed file types: doc, gif, jpg, jpeg, mpg, pdf, png, txt, zip, rar, csv, xls, xlsx, docx, xlsm, psd, cpp, mp4, mp3, webm, ogg, webp, py
Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Travel assistants
« on: March 22, 2026, 11:25:52 pm »

No real reason?
It's all very real grav .

Mind control.

Check out how many books your library stocks on this matter.

Politicians have allways learnt from magicians.
Posted by: grav
« on: March 22, 2026, 03:13:25 pm »

What do we know about our world?
Imo, almost nothing. Civilian earthlings can fly up to 20 miles in an airplane, dig a few feet under the ground.
World leaders start wars by lying about nukes and other threats.
Doctors and hospitals stick poisons into our bodies and government bureaucrats force us to cooperate with crooked lawyers and insurance companies. Our food is loaded with chems and parasites.
Schools and universities teach fake history and fake science.

But. For some proverbially weird reason, people trust the "experts."
They never Question Authority. They BELIEVE. in their country. their religion. their influencers.
Homo ignoranus operates like a well-progammed robot. an obedient slave. a zombie.
who is sure that we live on a spinning ball.
Posted by: grav
« on: March 22, 2026, 02:54:27 pm »

What causes earthquakes?
The Body Scientific says that tectonic plates shift and shake the lithospere (rocky crust of the globe ball), which is about 60 miles deep.
They know that because they have ground-penetrating radar that works to around 50 feet.





Posted by: anon
« on: March 21, 2026, 04:31:11 pm »



Do you ever check to see if these flat earth sites are lying to you? Probably not.

I can tell you right from the get go that they are using a very distorted flat map of a globe to compare these images too and have the images from space mislabeled as well.

https://images.nasa.gov/details/PIA18033

Quote
Behold one of the more detailed images of the Earth yet created. This Blue Marble Earth montage shown above -- created from photographs taken by the Visible/Infrared Imager Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) instrument on board the new Suomi NPP satellite -- shows many stunning details of our home planet. The Suomi NPP satellite was launched last October and renamed last week after Verner Suomi, commonly deemed the father of satellite meteorology. The composite was created from the data collected during four orbits of the robotic satellite taken earlier this month and digitally projected onto the globe. Many features of North America and the Western Hemisphere are particularly visible on a high resolution version of the image.

The satellite was also 500 miles up for Blue marble 2012, close enough so that the perspective is a little off.

I don't find any picture of the earth that NASA has labeled Blue Marble 2022, maybe you can find it.

Map projections are funny things, it's hard to project a 3d globe on a 2d flat piece of paper.




The red one is WAY more accurate, the bottom is the most common and what was used in your meme, but they are both really really wrong.

https://map-projections.net/compare.php?p1=gall-peters&p2=mercator-84&w=0
Posted by: grav
« on: March 21, 2026, 12:41:23 pm »

Posted by: anon
« on: March 21, 2026, 11:17:49 am »

Good new, space cadets!   ;D     :D     :)

Sky News
https://news.sky.com › story › nasa-prepares-artemis-ii-launch-with-rocket-back-on-site-and-crew-in-quarantine-13522109
NASA prepares Artemis II launch - with rocket back on site and crew in ...
5:12
1 day ago
NASA prepares Artemis II launch - with rocket back on site and crew in quarantine NASA says it is now targeting a launch window from 1 April to 6


Yeah, baby!!!   We're going back to the moon! Finally. Not since 1972 has the Body Scientific put boots on (or pretty darn near) the ground of the moon.
Trust the Science.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthrise

Quote
Earthrise is a photograph of Earth that was taken from lunar orbit by astronaut William Anders on December 24, 1968, during the Apollo 8 mission.



https://images.nasa.gov/details/as11-44-6551

Your picture is from Apollo 11



Try finding where is was ever attributed to Apollo 12 by NASA.
Posted by: anon
« on: March 21, 2026, 09:37:35 am »

Good new, space cadets!   ;D     :D     :)

Sky News
https://news.sky.com › story › nasa-prepares-artemis-ii-launch-with-rocket-back-on-site-and-crew-in-quarantine-13522109
NASA prepares Artemis II launch - with rocket back on site and crew in ...
5:12
1 day ago
NASA prepares Artemis II launch - with rocket back on site and crew in quarantine NASA says it is now targeting a launch window from 1 April to 6


Yeah, baby!!!   We're going back to the moon! Finally. Not since 1972 has the Body Scientific put boots on (or pretty darn near) the ground of the moon.
Trust the Science.


The place you got that meme from is lying to you. Those are the same pictures cropped differently of the same mission. NASA NEVER publishing them that way and never labeled them as from different missions.
Posted by: anon
« on: March 21, 2026, 09:36:27 am »

Good new, space cadets!   ;D     :D     :)

Sky News
https://news.sky.com › story › nasa-prepares-artemis-ii-launch-with-rocket-back-on-site-and-crew-in-quarantine-13522109
NASA prepares Artemis II launch - with rocket back on site and crew in ...
5:12
1 day ago
NASA prepares Artemis II launch - with rocket back on site and crew in quarantine NASA says it is now targeting a launch window from 1 April to 6


Yeah, baby!!!   We're going back to the moon! Finally. Not since 1972 has the Body Scientific put boots on (or pretty darn near) the ground of the moon.
Trust the Science.


The place you got that meme from is lying to you. Those are the same pictures cropped differently of the same mission. NASA publishing them that way and never labeled them as from different missions.
Posted by: grav
« on: March 21, 2026, 07:54:46 am »

Good new, space cadets!   ;D     :D     :)

Sky News
https://news.sky.com › story › nasa-prepares-artemis-ii-launch-with-rocket-back-on-site-and-crew-in-quarantine-13522109
NASA prepares Artemis II launch - with rocket back on site and crew in ...
5:12
1 day ago
NASA prepares Artemis II launch - with rocket back on site and crew in quarantine NASA says it is now targeting a launch window from 1 April to 6


Yeah, baby!!!   We're going back to the moon! Finally. Not since 1972 has the Body Scientific put boots on (or pretty darn near) the ground of the moon.
Trust the Science.
Posted by: anon
« on: March 19, 2026, 10:50:52 am »

My full name is Auntie gravity.
because . . .
I oppose the damfool notion that the spinning ball world creates a force that compels water and air to stick like glue to the surface rotating 1000 mph and spiralling 66,600 mph.



It represents real science, albeit burdened with fanciful vocabulary -- sprites, elves?
The green halo is of course the dome/firmament.
The flat and motionless earth itself is the "ground" portion of the battery, providing metals and saltwater which receive an electric current through the North Pole.

The Body Scientic (BS) is well aware of this structure and performed numerous experiments back in the 1960s to measure the height and dimensions of the dome.
But, since Homo ignoranus is under the spell of satanic freemasons, the feeble-minded earthlings continue to believe-trust-obey their BS Control System. Ergo, also, we are ruled by warmongers, drug cartels, mass murderers.


Can you show me one case where anyone ever claimed that the spinning had anything to do with causing the force of gravity?
I've noticed that people opposed to the reality of hard science often trot out a word or two here and there to make the truths they deny seem silly.


Then there's all the denigrating language you like to use to describe people that don't agree with your unproven and unprovable ideas.

Reminds me quite a lot of the language the church used to describe those who had discovered that the earth wasn't the center of the universe once upon a time.
Posted by: grav
« on: March 19, 2026, 07:55:33 am »

My full name is Auntie gravity.
because . . . 
I oppose the damfool notion that the spinning ball world creates a force that compels water and air to stick like glue to the surface rotating 1000 mph and spiralling 66,600 mph.



It represents real science, albeit burdened with fanciful vocabulary -- sprites, elves?
The green halo is of course the dome/firmament.
The flat and motionless earth itself is the "ground" portion of the battery, providing metals and saltwater which receive an electric current through the North Pole. 

The Body Scientic (BS) is well aware of this structure and performed numerous experiments back in the 1960s to measure the height and dimensions of the dome.
But, since Homo ignoranus is under the spell of satanic freemasons, the feeble-minded earthlings continue to believe-trust-obey their BS Control System. Ergo, also, we are ruled by warmongers, drug cartels, mass murderers.
Posted by: anon
« on: March 16, 2026, 10:26:39 am »


I'm about halfway through Martin's video about the dome. I wish he'd do a #short# version summarizing main ideas.
Does the dome itself move? umm, I think the word 'firmament' may describe its solid structure, as the celestial vault which remains motionless, while another mechanism/s move the stars, sun, and moon.
The rockets that reach the upper limits look like motorboats churning up a wake.


But liquid water would not be floating up there under the dome. More likely noble gases ionized by an energy source.
plasma, that is. Like the the liquid qualities of blood. Mother Earth's blood?

Nos Condunden also discusses the dome, which the Greek titan, Atlas, held up.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=A17-f8DrwlE&t=295s

Completely avoided the whole cropped low rez grainy picture I see.
Posted by: grav
« on: March 16, 2026, 08:49:58 am »


I'm about halfway through Martin's video about the dome. I wish he'd do a #short# version summarizing main ideas.
Does the dome itself move? umm, I think the word 'firmament' may describe its solid structure, as the celestial vault which remains motionless, while another mechanism/s move the stars, sun, and moon.
The rockets that reach the upper limits look like motorboats churning up a wake.


But liquid water would not be floating up there under the dome. More likely noble gases ionized by an energy source.
plasma, that is. Like the the liquid qualities of blood. Mother Earth's blood?

Nos Condunden also discusses the dome, which the Greek titan, Atlas, held up.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=A17-f8DrwlE&t=295s
Posted by: anon
« on: March 15, 2026, 09:48:30 am »


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4JsyyDKok74
2-1/2  hours

It's not the changing Sun that's causing the Realm to warm.  It's the Dome above us is getting Old, and has been failing for centuries.
Efforts to stop the dome from Shattering completely are in operation.
But the Time will come when the sky falls in, and the waters above follow! 

Watch this video & I will explain the pattern.  Buckle Up! 🙃

Welcome back to Flaterday Live with you're host Marticus Von Guffa. Enjoy!

Wait, I thought NASA was trying to shatter the dome with some bombs or something.

And 2 1/2 hours? Come on Man!  I thought it was a projection from the black sun or something anyway.
Posted by: grav
« on: March 15, 2026, 08:56:20 am »



The Dark Rift, Milky Way, Birth Canal of Mother Earth, Crack in the Dome, etc.
I haven't finished watching Martin's long video yet, but I expect he will touch on the myth of the Great Flood.